Crypto Industry Leaders Call for Key Developer Protections in Clarity Act
Major cryptocurrency firms are pressing the U.S. Senate to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, emphasizing crucial protections for blockchain developers.
The cryptocurrency industry's leading figures are urging the U.S. Senate to advance the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a landmark piece of legislation aimed at providing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets. Over 60 CEOs and founders from prominent crypto companies, including Coinbase, a16z crypto, Uniswap, Solana Labs, and Kraken, recently sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Their primary demand is the inclusion of specific provisions that shield blockchain developers from undue regulatory burdens.
The letter, dated June 9, emphasizes that the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), integrated as Section 604 within the broader Clarity Act, is a non-negotiable condition for their support. Without the BRCA, they argue, the bill would fail to create the necessary legal certainty for sustained blockchain innovation in the United States. This protection is crucial for developers working on everything from core Bitcoin infrastructure to innovative DeFi smart contracts, ensuring they can openly build and contribute to community-driven software projects without fear of legal repercussions.
The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress
Formally known as H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has been under development for several years. It successfully passed the House of Representatives in July 2025 with a significant bipartisan vote of 294-134, indicating broad legislative interest in establishing a federal framework for digital asset classification. However, the bill encountered delays in the Senate. A notable instance occurred in January 2026 when the Senate Banking Committee postponed a scheduled review after Coinbase withdrew its support over a proposed ban on stablecoin rewards.
More recently, on May 14, 2026, the Senate Banking Committee approved the legislation in a 15-9 vote, with bipartisan backing from Democrats Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks joining Republicans. The bill was subsequently placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar on June 1, 2026. Industry analysts, such as Galaxy Research, estimate a 60-75% chance of the bill becoming law in 2026, with a potential presidential signature by the week of August 3. However, Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the bill's key architects, has cautioned against premature celebration, stating, "Nobody is popping the champagne quite yet." Crypto firms have previously urged the Senate to pass similar legislation.
Protecting Innovation: The Core of the Debate
The BRCA (Section 604) is designed to codify existing guidance from FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), which clarified in 2019 that developers and infrastructure providers who do not hold or control user funds are not considered money transmitters. This means they would not be subject to Bank Secrecy Act registration requirements or criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1960. This provision draws a critical distinction between regulated financial services, like exchanges and hosted wallets, and the development of open-source protocols. Organizations like the DeFi Education Fund and Coin Center view the BRCA as a fundamental requirement for any effective market structure bill, arguing that its absence would expose developers to the risk of prosecution for simply building permissionless software.
The June 9 letter also calls for the preservation of companion protections. These include Section 601 of the Clarity Act, which exempts developers from SEC registration requirements, and Section 207 of the Senate Agriculture Committee’s Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, which offers similar exemptions under commodities law. Despite its progress, the bill still faces a complex path. The versions from the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees must be reconciled before a full Senate floor vote, where it will need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. Following this, the Senate and House versions must be harmonized before reaching the president's desk. Some Senate Democrats, led by Senator Elizabeth Warren, remain critical, contending that the bill's anti-money laundering provisions are still too weak. Concerns have been raised about the Clarity Act's potential loopholes.
Key Takeaways:
- Over 60 crypto industry leaders advocate for the Clarity Act's passage with developer protections.
- The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), Section 604, is central, shielding non-custodial developers from money transmission laws.
- The bill has bipartisan support but faces a demanding legislative process and opposition over its anti-money laundering aspects.
- Industry leaders stress that developer protections are vital for maintaining U.S. blockchain innovation.
◆ Similar signals

CFTC Initiates Legal Action Against New Mexico Over Prediction Market Jurisdiction
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has filed a lawsuit against New Mexico, marking the eighth state challenged over prediction market oversight.

Crypto Faces a Summer of Intense Regulatory Scrutiny and Legal Challenges
The cryptocurrency industry is navigating a busy summer of legislative debates, new regulatory proposals, and escalating court cases that will define its future.

SEC's Approach to Tokenization Through Exemptions Raises Questions on Long-Term Stability
The SEC's strategy of granting exemptions for tokenization initiatives, rather than establishing full rules, may lack long-term regulatory resilience.