TheCryptoDesk
Live Prices
BTC$63,232.00+1.73%ETH$1,747.24+0.61%USDT$0.999211+0.00%BNB$569.60+0.56%USDC$0.999813+0.01%XRP$1.10+0.53%SOL$78.03+1.06%TRX$0.332069+0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.03-0.06%HYPE$67.11+0.03%DOGE$0.07317+1.04%USDS$0.999751+0.01%RAIN$0.014426-1.20%LEO$9.51+0.55%
Regulation // 2m read

Phantom and Hyperliquid Urge CFTC to Modernize Onchain Derivatives Regulations

By TheCryptoDesk Editorial

Phantom and Hyperliquid Urge CFTC to Modernize Onchain Derivatives Regulations

Leading Web3 wallet provider Phantom and decentralized derivatives exchange Hyperliquid have jointly appealed to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), urging the regulator to update its rules for onchain derivatives. Their primary request is for blockchain developers and non-custodial wallet providers to be exempted from regulations traditionally applied to financial intermediaries.

The companies argue that the current regulatory framework, designed for conventional financial institutions, does not accurately reflect the decentralized and non-custodial nature of blockchain technology. Applying these rules without distinction could stifle innovation and create unnecessary burdens for entities that do not hold customer funds or act as central counterparties.

Call for Differentiated Approach

Phantom and Hyperliquid highlighted that their roles are fundamentally different from those of traditional brokers or exchanges. Phantom, as a non-custodial wallet, provides users with tools to manage their own digital assets, without ever taking custody. Similarly, Hyperliquid operates as a decentralized protocol where users interact directly with smart contracts, eliminating the need for a central intermediary to hold assets or execute trades. This distinction is crucial for understanding why they seek exemption from rules intended for entities that manage customer funds and liabilities.

They contend that imposing traditional intermediary requirements, such as extensive Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) obligations on non-custodial wallet providers or core blockchain developers, is impractical and misaligned with their operational models. Such an approach could inadvertently push innovation offshore or prevent the development of beneficial decentralized applications within the U.S. financial ecosystem. This push for regulatory clarity echoes broader industry efforts, as seen with discussions around the New Clarity Act Draft aimed at defining digital asset roles.

Why It Matters

This joint appeal by Phantom and Hyperliquid represents a significant effort from prominent crypto entities to shape the regulatory landscape for decentralized finance (DeFi) in the United States. A favorable response from the CFTC could establish a precedent for how decentralized technologies are regulated, potentially fostering a more innovation-friendly environment for onchain derivatives. Conversely, a failure to differentiate could impose burdensome requirements that hinder the growth of legitimate decentralized applications, impacting protocols like Hyperliquid's onchain perps and other emerging DeFi platforms.

Key Takeaways

  • Phantom and Hyperliquid are seeking CFTC rule modernization.
  • They request exemptions for blockchain developers and non-custodial wallet providers.
  • The goal is to differentiate these entities from traditional financial intermediaries.
  • The move aims to prevent stifling DeFi innovation in the U.S.
  • This highlights the ongoing challenge of applying existing regulations to novel blockchain models.

Related