In a surprising turn of events, renowned economist Kenneth Rogoff has retracted his long-held prediction that Bitcoin would plummet to just $100. After nearly a decade, he openly acknowledged that his assessment was riddled with fundamental errors. Rogoff, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), candidly shared his miscalculations in a recent post on social media, where he reflected on the growing prominence and resilience of cryptocurrencies in today’s economy.
Rogoff initially made headlines back in 2018 when he proclaimed that Bitcoin was “more likely to be worth $100 than $100,000” over a ten-year span. Fast forward to 2025, and Bitcoin has defied expectations, currently trading at over $115,000. What went wrong? Let’s dive into the intriguing details of Rogoff’s reassessment and what it means for the future of digital currencies.
One of Rogoff’s primary mistakes was his overly optimistic belief that the United States would enact sensible regulations for cryptocurrency. Instead of imposing stringent crackdowns, the Trump administration introduced pivotal legislation that supported the crypto sector. This included the GENIUS Act, which provided a regulatory framework for stablecoins, and the CLARITY Act, which shifted oversight from the SEC to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. These legislative moves not only clarified regulations but also heralded a surprising pro-crypto environment that Rogoff had not anticipated. You can find additional insights on regulatory developments from credible sources like Forbes.
Another significant error in Rogoff’s calculations revolved around Bitcoin’s burgeoning role in the global underground economy, a $20 trillion market where illicit transactions have traditionally relied on cash. Rogoff admitted that he underestimated how Bitcoin would emerge as a preferred medium of exchange in these unregulated settings. Its popularity in the underground economy creates a price floor for Bitcoin, as its utility goes beyond mere speculation, contradicting Rogoff’s initial assumption that halting illegal activities would lead to a price collapse. The ongoing reliance on Bitcoin within these markets illustrates how the cryptocurrency has carved out indispensable real-world applications.
Source: Bitbo
Rogoff’s final miscalculation involved the political landscape surrounding cryptocurrency. He expressed astonishment over the extent of cryptocurrency holdings among regulators, particularly noting that many government officials, including influential figures like Donald Trump, openly accumulated substantial crypto wealth. Rogoff was particularly concerned about conflicts of interest arising from these relationships. As of now, Trump reportedly holds over $1.2 billion in various cryptocurrencies, spreading across different ventures and wallets, raising eyebrows over the political implications of these assets.
Source: Cryptonews
Interestingly, more than 20% of Trump’s advisors and close aides are also crypto investors, including Vice President JD Vance. This pervasive involvement raises significant questions about the integrity of policymaking in an industry where the lines between regulation and self-interest appear blurred. Critics from various factions have pointed out that Trump’s crypto interests and the financial contributions from the crypto industry to his political campaigns could undermine the independence of important regulatory decisions.
As Rogoff reevaluates his position, he stands in stark contrast to other notable skeptics in the economic sphere. Figures like Warren Buffett, Jamie Dimon, and Paul Krugman have remained steadfast in their criticism of Bitcoin, labeling it everything from “rat poison” to a mere fad lacking intrinsic value. However, Rogoff’s shift illustrates a broader trend in the discourse surrounding cryptocurrencies. Could this signal a turning point in how we approach and understand the rapidly evolving world of digital assets?
Looking ahead, the future of cryptocurrency regulation is delicate and crucial. As more lawmakers begin to recognize the potential benefits and indelible presence of cryptocurrencies in both legitimate and underground economies, we may witness a more balanced regulatory environment that encourages innovation rather than stifles it. Will Rogoff’s reflections spark a wave of reevaluation among skeptics, or will they continue to resist the tide? As the landscape evolves, one thing is clear: the conversation around Bitcoin and its place in our financial systems is far from over. Stay tuned as we continue to cover these developments and their implications for the world of cryptocurrency.
For ongoing coverage of the cryptocurrency space and in-depth insights, check out CoinDesk and CryptoNews.